From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 20 21:03:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558961065676 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:03:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: from smtp.mel.people.net.au (smtp.mel.people.net.au [218.214.17.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 756978FC4A for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:03:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: (qmail 28161 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2008 20:36:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blizzard.dnsalias.org) (218.215.135.248) by smtp.mel.people.net.au with SMTP; 20 Apr 2008 20:36:38 -0000 Received: by blizzard.dnsalias.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AAB4617073; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:36:36 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:36:36 +1000 From: andrew clarke To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20080420203636.GA59438@ozzmosis.com> References: <20080419211122.GA22300@thought.org> <480AC57D.80502@frase.id.au> <480AEDE3.7030407@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <480AEDE3.7030407@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Firefox plugins from Ports [was Re: question about "gnash" or "kde-gnash"] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:03:21 -0000 On Sun 2008-04-20 08:16:51 UTC+0100, Matthew Seaman (m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) wrote: > xpi-noscript is even better IMHO. Blocks flash, javascript and all > forms of embedded media. Will remember the sites where you *do* want > that stuff, or it will let you turn it on temporarily. It's in ports: > www/xpi-noscript Not guaranteed to block every advert, but the ones it > does let through will be relatively inoffensive. For advert blocking there is www/xpi-adblock_plus. But my main reason to responding to this post is because I'm wondering what the pros and cons are of installing Firefox plugins from the Ports tree, versus installing them directly from within Firefox itself. I assume that plugins installed from Ports are activated for all users and cannot be disabled by the user, unless they run pkg_delete.