From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May  1 11:13:01 2003
Return-Path: <owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767)
	id 6352537B404; Thu,  1 May 2003 11:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id ED63E37B401; Thu,  1 May 2003 11:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A36BE43FA3; Thu,  1 May 2003 11:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@ofug.org)
Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id A64DC530E; Thu,  1 May 2003 20:12:56 +0200 (CEST)
X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/
X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily
  coincide with those of any organisation or company with
  which I am or have been affiliated.
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 20:12:55 +0200
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20030501140520.jhb@FreeBSD.org> (John Baldwin's message
 of "Thu, 01 May 2003 14:05:20 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-ID: <xzpd6j2r0wo.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.3
References: <XFMail.20030501140520.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 30311 for review
X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: p4 projects tree changes <p4-projects.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/p4-projects>,
	<mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/p4-projects>
List-Post: <mailto:p4-projects@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/p4-projects>,
	<mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 18:13:01 -0000

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> On 01-May-2003 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>>       Some compilers (gcc at least) promote the integer literal 0x80000000
>>       to long, while enums are required to fit in an int.  To avoid the
>>       warning this causes, use (-0x7fffffff - 1) instead of 0x80000000.
> You could just use 0x40000000. :)

No, I couldn't.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org