From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 4 22:02:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079FADFA for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 22:02:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52CD8FC0C for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 22:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p5DD4596B.dip.t-dialin.net [93.212.89.107]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F618844096; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 23:02:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from unknown (IO.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.12]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6A202191; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 23:02:42 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=leidinger.net; s=outgoing-alex; t=1352066562; bh=esLr5BkgEP3ZznVJWuEzZy3kqI8XKeHBbMtf7F1o5r4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=i/P1WqtGGDXgevhVyYF4sg0+tIQU87MZ8bWTecACy3Yld8h6p33x2pFe45ye8CvST FPfS6MEfyCFc3afviovPbiVVQGhcKM75M+GKATRYSI0vlYi/E1VU5nVeHx49HvyW/e iUb+717Ey0423mx/IXnmZDlCqDNnFIn25eV/g+gdSu8jbUydN+7j9DSzx9GXn+nKzV U33OWaKKCZSzg8q/iHBcERlMh5qKIglCu10RE59pQSFpLYMqTui1PsEjY1NZ+1R8gW LrsBDJqyn056WlVdIpDFz0geqZCau+9XSkGS1VLS6Y8fVkwZNg1auqgolHo58BA1Gk hiJmmXeFTVOVA== Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 23:02:45 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Scot Hetzel Subject: Re: Do we have a CPUTYPE=native and/or generic stability problem? Message-ID: <20121104230245.00007139@unknown> In-Reply-To: References: <20121103232433.00005eee@unknown> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0cvs30 (GTK+ 2.24.10; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 5F618844096.A011A X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.663, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, AWL -0.76, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10, T_DKIM_INVALID 0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD -0.01) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1352671365.781@SZkZFaFmj2j4MghsVltgQA X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 22:02:48 -0000 On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 03:43:13 -0600 Scot Hetzel wrote: > Not sure if your hitting the same bug, that was found in PR 112997. > > When you set CPUTYPE?=native, bsd.cpu.mk doesn't set MACHINE_CPU to > the correct values for your CPUTYPE. > > See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/112997 for a patch > to bsd.cpu.mk. I try to get a look at it this week. > Does your system compile correctly, if you specify the CPUTYPE? I haven't tried it yet. I will give it a try later. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137