From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 15:32:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA19A16A4F5 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:32:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from demdwug7.mediaways.net (smtp.compuserve.de [62.52.27.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 834C843D3F for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:32:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Hilko.Meyer@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 5065 invoked by uid 4218); 25 Mar 2004 23:32:21 -0000 Received: from c187.home.uni-hannover.de (130.75.234.187) by relay2a.cso.mediaways.net with SMTP; 25 Mar 2004 23:32:21 -0000 From: Hilko Meyer To: Doug White Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:32:34 +0100 Message-ID: <3ll6601p9n67rm3hk9mvutc8qjidatjp9j@smtp.compuserve.de> References: <20040325111957.U49224@carver.gumbysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20040325111957.U49224@carver.gumbysoft.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode with samba X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:32:26 -0000 Hi, Doug White schrieb: >On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Hilko Meyer wrote: > >> I get an Fatal Trap 12 message if I access a CD-ROM-drive from a >> NT-machine over Samba. The CD-ROM is mountet with >> /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto,nosuid 0 = 0 >> in the /etc/fstab. > >What version of samba? samba-2.2.8a_1 installed from the portstree. >When did you sup -current last? It is 5.2.1-RELEASE-p3, not -current. I forgot to mention this. >This is really bizarre if its in the quota code, since you don't have >quotas enabled in the kernel. It looks like something is not registering >the QUOTACTL VFS method properly and is leaving it zeroed. > >I'll try to reproduce this on my work machine if I have time. > >> http://www.hochpass.uni-hannover.de/~hilti/dmesg >> http://www.hochpass.uni-hannover.de/~hilti/dmesg.verbose >> The kernel.conf is here = http://www.hochpass.uni-hannover.de/~hilti/KIRK > >Could you try it without CPU_WT_ALLOC in your kernel? Thats not a widely >used option. I will try it tomorrow. Thank you for your help, Hilko