From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 15 14:42:50 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CF737C5
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:42:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75074F5E
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:42:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAFEgopd028710
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:42:50 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 193135] [NEW PORT] www/seahub: Seafile web server front end
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:42:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: yan_jingfeng@yahoo.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-193135-13-TXzUqOnc7A@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-193135-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-193135-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:42:50 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193135

--- Comment #30 from Jingfeng Yan <yan_jingfeng@yahoo.com> ---
(In reply to John Marino from comment #29)
> (In reply to Jingfeng Yan from comment #28)
> > Holy C... The test can not access WWW network?!
> 
> Poudriere only allows network access at the fetch phase.  A port should
> never use the network after that.

Then, I have very limited choice, which does not do anything for django related
dependency, and as the Seahub release way, leave this part to the users.  Or, I
have to fight hard to say something like this:

Why reviewboard-1.7.22 requires djblets, then it get a specific version of
djblets.  If other application needs other version of djblets, why we can not
have a version of djblets for that app?

You can also check:

There is no one use py27-django-pipeline 1.3+, but only review board use
another version: py27-django-pipeline12.

That is why I am confused what is the policy for python pkg version port in
FreeBSD port system. Do I miss any important point from the other thread.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.