From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 23 09:12:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFAC37B401 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:12:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chivas.oneill.dhs.org (chivas.oneill.dhs.org [65.65.85.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F4943F75 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:12:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sean@seanoneill.info) Received: from v812r.seanoneill.info (dhcp1.NONROUTABLE.COM [192.168.2.1]) by chivas.oneill.dhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2437605 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:12:22 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030423110805.2c346398@pop.swbell.yahoo.com> X-Sender: swoneill@swbell.net@pop.swbell.yahoo.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:12:15 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Sean O'Neill In-Reply-To: References: <20030423130711.F632@ndhn.yna.cnyserzna.pbz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.8a no go on 4.8-Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:12:27 -0000 At 04:29 PM 4/23/2003 +0100, Jan Grant wrote: >On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, William Palfreman wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, dick hoogendijk wrote: > > > > > On 23 Apr dick hoogendijk wrote: > > > > > > > Hmm, I don't like cups. Is it possible to *NOT* install cups but the > > > > good old lpd (which already runs ;-) ? > > > > > > Oeps, bummer.. Forgot to look into the portfiles ;-) > > > Very nice options screen. So, forget my prev msg please.. > > > > This fixed it for me too. I must not have had a single windows user > > since 2.2.8a came out, and missed the original change from lpd to cups > > by default. It would be nice if the options screen defaulted to the > > current settings when doing a portupgrade, or if there was an obvious > > way of disabling it and using what setting currently exist. The > > brain-free option, if you like. The problem is that I certainly don't > > usually remember what options I set in these screens first time round, > > when it comes to updating it six months later. > >I've a line much like this in my pkgtools.conf, in the MAKE_ARGS >section: > > 'net/samba' => 'BATCH=yes WITH_SYSLOG=yes WITH_SSL=yes', > >The "BATCH=yes" suppresses the dialog. Can someone do me a HUGE favor and let me know how they built the Samba 2.2.8a port ? I'm running 2.2.7 right now. When I tried upgrading to 2.2.8a, the make complained that my libtool is too old. Well, my libtool current as of the FreeBSD ports tree - v1.3. I've seen some activity on the ports mailing list that some folks are working on upgrading the libtool port to v1.4 which I assume is what Samba 2.2.8a is probably expecting. I built subversion from scratch because of the libtool port issue but I'm kinda hoping to not have to do that with Samba. -- Sean O'Neill