From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Aug 14 22:37:30 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id WAA23596
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 14 Aug 1995 22:37:30 -0700
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [198.137.146.49])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA23590
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 14 Aug 1995 22:37:26 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id XAA02224; Mon, 14 Aug 1995 23:36:58 -0600
Message-Id: <199508150536.XAA02224@rover.village.org>
To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: make(1) extension for SHELL COMMANDS 
Cc: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de>, current@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 14 Aug 1995 11:35:35 EDT
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 23:36:57 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

: that all commands are to be executed by means of `/bin/sh -c'

Doesn't it say that all commands must be executed as if they were
executed by means of /bin/sh -c?  If the result is the same, then you
don't, strictly speaking, have to have /bin/sh exec'd.

Desirable?  I don't think so, but I think it is allowed.

Warner