From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 20 3: 2:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail.iol.ie (mail1.mail.iol.ie [194.125.2.192]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810751B24D for ; Wed, 20 Oct 1999 03:02:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nick@iol.ie) Received: from beckett.earlsfort.iol.ie (beckett.earlsfort.iol.ie [194.125.21.2]) by mail.iol.ie Sendmail (v8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA90947 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 1999 11:02:09 +0100 (IST) Received: (from nick@localhost) by beckett.earlsfort.iol.ie Sendmail (v8.8.8) id LAA12741 for hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Oct 1999 11:02:08 +0100 From: Nick Hilliard Message-Id: <199910201002.LAA12741@beckett.earlsfort.iol.ie> Subject: Re: Class C hack instead of ifconfig aliases To: hackers@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 11:02:08 +0100 (IST) X-NCC-RegID: ie.iol Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > What do you mean by "bind a class C"? Make an interface so it will > respond to incoming requests for 10.1.2.x? ewww, yuck! Is it any less elegant than having in_localaddr() trawling through each item on the address list? Perhaps 1024 items if you've got a large vweb server? That's also pretty inelegant. I seem to remember someone producing some patches for this on bsdi a couple of years ago. Nick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message