From owner-cvs-all Fri Sep 14 5:52:34 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C863637B40D; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 05:52:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA08803; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 22:52:21 +1000 Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 22:51:58 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: To: Brian Somers Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven , , Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys cdefs.h In-Reply-To: <20010914221545.G18664-100000@delplex.bde.org> Message-ID: <20010914224302.R18852-100000@delplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, I wrote: > This regression may be related to breakage of lint(1). lint(1) now > uses a wrong version of cpp, one that pre-defines __GNUC__. Since lint > is not gcc, this defeats all the __GNUC__ ifdefs in . In > particular, __attributes__'s in important macros like __printflike are > exposed to lint and lint barfs on important headers like that > expand these macros. Actually, the hard __attribute__'s don't affect lint(1), because subsequent breakage of lint added the define-away-__attribue__ hack to lint itself. Only all other __GNUC__ ifdefs are defeated. This is less fatal than I would have thought, since lint supports __asm directly. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message