Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 16:07:13 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222517] graphics/pngcrush: Update to 1.8.13 Message-ID: <bug-222517-13-FDXpbL3KTS@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-222517-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-222517-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222517 lightside <lightside@gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #186667| |maintainer-approval?(vsasja Flags| |son@gmail.com) --- Comment #4 from lightside <lightside@gmx.com> --- Created attachment 186667 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D186667&action= =3Dedit Proposed patch (since 425824 revision, with license definition) (In reply to from comment #3) > Looks ok for me. Thanks for review. (In reply to from comment #3) > Note there is a warning about LICENSE Yes, I saw following warning from portlint output: WARN: Makefile: Consider defining LICENSE. Looks like, the pngcrush has a custom license. According to https://pmt.sourceforge.io/pngcrush/ -8<-- Pngcrush is open source and may be used, modified, and redistributed by any= one without paying a fee. The license, embedded in the file pngcrush.c, is equivalent but not identical to the libpng license found in the libpng file png.h. -->8- I attached new proposed patch with possible license definition. Please revi= ew it. I can remove/obsolete attachment #186619 in case of possible approval of new patch. Suggestions are welcome. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-222517-13-FDXpbL3KTS>