From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Jan 11 15:23:37 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16274CAAA71 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:23:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from citrin+bsd@citrin.ru) Received: from hz.citrin.ru (hz.citrin.ru [88.198.212.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D52291164 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:23:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from citrin+bsd@citrin.ru) Received: from x220.lan (c-24-60-168-172.hsd1.ct.comcast.net [24.60.168.172]) by hz.citrin.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 426C829A309 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:23:28 +0000 (UTC) From: Anton Yuzhaninov Subject: fe80::1%lo0 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <94a99b96-808b-8f50-a4a3-eec8659737cd@citrin.ru> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:23:26 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=citrin.ru; s=s0; t=1484148208; bh=1By8mEZqAktq8BSs2/QNN8ZPz9oE6VHEacWgv0Cv7H0=; h=From:Subject:To:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=5xIUL68sS7ldS5aHhtDtWu3ANocbjyamePkfeDY2KtJvHJi5U10tRPr6ykCI/XM3uAdoXzwHvyl2UEbE7C0nyNsipz5qHjVWNZjYmZxYDtsi62IoT5VAUUQWAIexAf1QUbr0WfMeFgLjwwx4L4MXsCWjaLlPgHcIAyNKGeEFFC0= X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:23:37 -0000 Hello, Why FreeBSD adds fe80::1%lo0 to the loopback interface? I know, that in IPv6 each interface should have a link-local address, but ::1 can be considered as link-local: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#section-2.5.3 I think fe80::1 is unnecessary can be removed. For all practical purposes ::1 should be enough. BTW Linux has only ::1 on the loopback interface.