From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 7 03:13:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E3816A400 for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2007 03:13:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.com) Received: from flpvm23.prodigy.net (flpvm23.prodigy.net [207.115.20.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8924B13C455 for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2007 03:13:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nawcom@nawcom.com) X-ORBL: [68.255.232.220] Received: from fedex.nphreak.local (adsl-68-255-232-220.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [68.255.232.220]) by flpvm23.prodigy.net (8.13.8 out.dk.spool/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6730aUm016805; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 20:00:37 -0700 Received: from nawcoms-computer.local (unknown [192.168.212.243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fedex.nphreak.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EC239823; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 23:01:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <468F01C5.4070108@nawcom.com> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 23:00:21 -0400 From: nawcom User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Macintosh/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tls@panix.com References: <20070707023700.GA11829@panix.com> In-Reply-To: <20070707023700.GA11829@panix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Safely mount OS X UFS filesystem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 03:13:09 -0000 i usually use the ufstype=openstep for darwin ufs filesystems, they seem to work just fine. -Ben Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: > Can I, on a system running FreeBSD 6.2 or -current, safely mount a > UFS filesystem created (and used) on Mac OS 10.4.10? These filesystems > are UFS1 (at fslevel 3) with big-endian datastructures in the metadata, > 4k blocks and 1k fragments, and a few minor oddities in their layout; > they are pretty much exactly the UFS NeXT used on their workstations. > > If so, Will such a filesystem be safe to mount under OS X after I use it > on FreeBSD? > > I seem to be able to mount these under NetBSD though the snapshot code > complains that inodes 64 and 16384 are not dedicated to snapshots. > >