Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 18:42:23 +0200 (MET DST) From: Ariel Burbaickij <Ariel.Burbaickij@mni.fh-giessen.de> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: Ariel Burbaickij <Ariel.Burbaickij@mni.fh-giessen.de>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: what do you allow in recent time to present to public or thegorystories of failed ... everything Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10008171819320.27199-100000@sun34> In-Reply-To: <20000816183457.Y4854@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Ariel Burbaickij <Ariel.Burbaickij@mni.fh-giessen.de> [000816 15:18] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > ^G Get Help ^X Send ^R Read File ^Y Prev Pg ^K Cut Text ^O > > Postpone bash-2.03# cd ../../usr.sbin/config/ > > bash-2.03# make depend all install clean > > install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 config /usr/sbin > > install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 config.8.gz /usr/share/man/man8 > > rm -f config config.o main.o lang.o mkioconf.o mkmakefile.o mkheaders.o > > mkoptions.o config.8.gz config.8.cat.gz lang.c config.c y.tab.c y.tab.h > > bash-2.03# cd ../../sys/i386/conf > > bash-2.03# config ZHESTIANKAKER5 > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found > > 4 ports are failed to install themself > > failed instalation of RELEASE > > 3 questions in this connection: > > 1)What is going on ? > > 2)How is the whole crap to bring in orderly condition > > 3)What is so wrong with idea of having different branches of > > ports ? > > 4) Why do you think that therapy by senseless activity must be succesful > > ? > > config is linking to the libc in your /usr/obj directory, I would > remove the /usr/obj directory then recompile config. > > -Alfred Find 3 differences between sample output some rows above and this one : bash-2.03# pwd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf bash-2.03# config ZHESTIANKAKER5 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found bash-2.03# Unable ? Same goes me.The difference is here,though.The later is made after removing /usr/obj and why did I do it follows it somehow from UPDATING ?No, it does not follows . I did it because you have advised it. Now the question:What is so wrong on the idea to first try what you intend to advise whether it works and then advise? Some common words are imho suitable here.You know after all operating system is just automaton implemented in software and defined by all possible variables and transitions.Now if it is not possible to transit from one well-defined condition 3.4 to another( hopefully)well-defined condition rigidly using transition function(UPGRADING)then there are just 2 explanations : 1)transition function is poorly defined 2)the condition to tranfer to is impossible in both cases blmae is with implementors (i.e. you .you as those who name themselves proudly core development team .Reasons to be proud are vanishing.) Regards. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10008171819320.27199-100000>