Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:35:36 -0600
From:      Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>
To:        araujo@FreeBSD.org, Grant Peel <gpeel@thenetnow.com>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Port: mod_security2-2.1.3
Message-ID:  <100DFC0D92D8944F6BD80509@utd59514.utdallas.edu>
In-Reply-To: <473725FE.3080702@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <007301c8245b$12c58ea0$6501a8c0@GRANT> <473725FE.3080702@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On Sunday, November 11, 2007 13:55:42 -0200 Marcelo Araujo 
<araujobsdport@gmail.com> wrote:

> Grant Peel wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> mod_security seems to have a problem with the MAC Safari browser using
>> some post statements.
>>
>> Accoring the the developers, these problems should be fixed in 2.1.4.
>>
>> Are there any plans to upgrade the port anytime soon?
>>
>> -Grant
>>
> Hey Grant,
>
> After freeze, I should work to do a upgrade on mod_security2 to new
> version. Thanks a lot for  the reporting.
>
> Best Regards.

Please be sure to add notes to UPDATING.  The change to version 2 of 
mod_security is a dramatic change that renders older versions obsolete. 
Folks who are using mod_security (includes me) need to know that they will 
have to completely rewrite their rules to use the new syntax.  (In fact, 
you may want to keep the older version in mod_security-1.3 or something 
like that to allow folks who don't want to make the change right away to 
continue to use the old port.)

-- 
Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?100DFC0D92D8944F6BD80509>