From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 15 01:51:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA07293 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 01:51:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.visint.co.uk (wakko.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA07286 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 08:51:39 GMT (envelope-from steve@visint.co.uk) Received: from dylan (dylan.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.180]) by mail.visint.co.uk (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA10591; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 09:51:26 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 09:52:32 +0100 (BST) From: Stephen Roome X-Sender: steve@dylan Reply-To: Stephen Roome To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Ted Spradley , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ps segfaults since I overclocked. and worries. In-Reply-To: <8203.892564455@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > ... it was absolutely necessary that certain ground rules be laid down > and one of those rules is *no overclocking during debugging*. It's a > very simple rule and one which is non-negotiable. Should it be added to either the list charter or the handbook page on the lists then ? [ Perhaps just after the bit about no personal attacks in section 25.1.3, (handbook317.html on www.freebsd.org) because people can get quite vehement about it! =) ] Agreed, It's a really important rule, seemingly an unspoken (even if obvious) one though. Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message