From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 15:00:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512C94BB for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 15:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E85E2B17 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 15:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r7IF01Ve041952 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 15:00:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r7IF01D1041950; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 15:00:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 15:00:01 GMT Message-Id: <201308181500.r7IF01D1041950@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Re: ports/180168: [maintainer update] net/Sockets 2.3.9.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Andrea Venturoli List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 15:00:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/180168; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andrea Venturoli To: Raphael Kubo da Costa Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/180168: [maintainer update] net/Sockets 2.3.9.9 Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:37:48 +0200 On 07/29/13 00:09, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Yes, please send another patch. Also note that if libxml is only needed > at build-time, you should use USE_GNOME=libxml2:build. > > Going back to the three points I mentioned originall, I guess this would > solve all of them, right? Here's the patch, which, I think, solves all problems arisen so far. Let me know. bye & Thanks av.