From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 6 11:59:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5F416A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:59:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4E04400B for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:59:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (37.80-203-228.nextgentel.com [80.203.228.37]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C58D78C60; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 20:59:43 +0100 (MET) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 22D519659F; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 20:59:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (dwp.des.no [10.0.0.4]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 245359593F; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 20:59:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 1D918B827; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 20:59:37 +0100 (CET) To: walt References: <3FA7BA12.7060702@myrealbox.com> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 20:59:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3FA7BA12.7060702@myrealbox.com> (wa1ter@myrealbox.com's message of "Tue, 04 Nov 2003 06:39:14 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on dsa.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sed behaving badly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 19:59:46 -0000 walt writes: > I got this nonsensical error from sed while trying to update python: > > /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's,/usr/doc/python-docs-,/usr/local/share/doc/pyt= hon,g' /usr/ports/lang/python/work/Python-2.3.2/Lib/pydoc.py > sed: /usr/ports/lang/python/work/Python-2.3.2/Lib/pydoc.py: No such file = or directory > > But the file DOES exist, and furthermore the same port compiles just fine= on > -CURRENT from November 1. I think the recent changes to sed may have bro= ken > something, but I don't know how, exactly. I introduced a bug a couple of days ago, and fixed it a few hours later. Just update and rebuild sed. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no