From owner-freebsd-current Sun Feb 28 23:32:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964BB15219 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 23:32:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA32640; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 23:32:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: obrien@NUXI.com Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:57:39 PST." <19990228225739.F3380@relay.nuxi.com> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 23:32:37 -0800 Message-ID: <32636.920273557@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Thus libg++ classes are a purely FSF class library that shouldn't be used > for any new code development. The current libg++ only contains what was > left after the ISO stdlibc++ stuff was gutted. Thanks for the explanation - that makes things much clearer. So, I guess we shoot for libstdc++ as the "minimum requirements" and perhaps provide libg++ as well (not necessarily initially) just for the convenience of those porting code from environments where the GNU library functions were used. I've just built the world and kernel from egcs-2.91.62 and it seems to work pretty well. I haven't really stress the system all that much yet, but it hasn't misbehaved in any way yet. - Jrodan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message