From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 10 11:48:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D0E151EA for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:48:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id LAA57482; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:44:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:44:20 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199903101944.LAA57482@apollo.backplane.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , sthaug@nethelp.no, dcs@newsguy.com, Jos.Backus@nl.origin-it.com, dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru, perhaps@yes.no, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: panic: zone: entry not free References: <32857.921094492@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I don't use DIAGNOSTIC because it's overly intrusive and cause cause panics or create bugs where none exist. At least that was true in 2.2.x. I remember trying to use it at BEST. The result was continually crashing machines due to bugs in the diagnostic code ( such as diagnostics that were using a blocking malloc() inside an interrupt ). Personally, I would be happier if DIAGNOSTIC were ripped out entirely and replaced with something less intrusive. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message