From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 16 23:44:39 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821A016A419; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CD713C457; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id lAGNiTB1024920; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:44:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: David Wolfskill Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:44:16 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200711161338.54270.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <200711161823.17730.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20071116232830.GB7943@bunrab.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <20071116232830.GB7943@bunrab.catwhisker.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200711161844.27009.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/4820/Fri Nov 16 17:50:55 2007 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [Call for Testers] ACPI-CA 20071114 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:44:39 -0000 On Friday 16 November 2007 06:28 pm, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 06:23:14PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > ... > > > > > FWIW, I'm pretty sure this is the same (fairly broken) behavior > > > as I see now. > > > > > > The machine is a Dell Inspiron 8200. > > > > You mean it did not improve nor regress anything, right? > > Correct: no leakage of "magic smoke;" no behavioral change that I > see. Good to know. > I didn't even get the LOR (though if that was specific to the IBM > ACPI stuff, it would make a certain amount of sense that I > wouldn'tsee it.) Yes, it was IBM (and Asus) specific issue and I just updated the patchset with the fix. Thanks for the feedback! Jung-uk Kim