From owner-freebsd-questions Thu May 18 7:39:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from unix.megared.net.mx (megamail.megared.com.mx [200.52.207.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9176F37B5D1 for ; Thu, 18 May 2000 07:39:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ales@megared.net.mx) Received: from ales (ales.megared.net.mx [207.249.162.41]) by unix.megared.net.mx (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA64677; Thu, 18 May 2000 09:40:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ales@megared.net.mx) Message-ID: <021b01bfc0d6$c0b0a680$d2630a0a@megared.net.mx> From: "Alejandro Ramirez" To: "Dan Larsson" , References: Subject: Re: softupdates with squid. Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 09:38:37 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, > Has anyone done any benchmarking on squid > with softupdates on cacheslices? Does squid > benefit from having the cache on a soft-updated > slice? SoftUpdates does a great job for squid cache slices, I dont have a benchmark, but if you turn it up, you will see the performance boost in your system. Have Fun... Ales To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message