From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep  9 15:16:08 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: doc@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1215D106566C
	for <doc@FreeBSD.org>; Fri,  9 Sep 2011 15:16:08 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [199.48.134.227])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7D848FC15
	for <doc@FreeBSD.org>; Fri,  9 Sep 2011 15:16:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 5834 invoked by uid 0); 9 Sep 2011 11:03:46 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO schism.local) (gjb@75.146.225.65)
	by 0 with SMTP; 9 Sep 2011 11:03:46 -0400
Message-ID: <4E6A2AD2.2040702@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:03:46 -0400
From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
	rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steve Thompson <steve.f.thompson@gmail.com>
References: <CAKPZRnVrnydy65H21GqF=-C5eimVeCpTNga0+m31ooXhssQaTg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKPZRnVrnydy65H21GqF=-C5eimVeCpTNga0+m31ooXhssQaTg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Doc issue for 9.0 release notes?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:16:08 -0000

Hi Steve,

On 9/9/11 10:25 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> According to section 2.2.5 ZFS has just been upgraded to version 14.  See:
> http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/CURRENT/relnotes/article.html#DISKS
> 
> However, according to wikipedia's ZFS entry FreeBSD 9.0 is supposed to
> include version 28.  See
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS#Version_numbers<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS>
> .
> 
> Which one is correct?
> 

ZFS version 28 is the correct version.  Once the doc tree is tagged
(scheduled for today), this can be fixed.  Thanks for pointing this out.

> P.S. I'm really interested in knowing when FreeBSD will have version 30 that
> includes encryption.
> 

Last I was aware, version 30 is closed-source and owned by Oracle.
Unless they release the source as Sun was doing, I doubt we will have
ZFS version 30.  (I would be happy to be told this is not true, though -
I'd love to have ZFS encryption as well.)

Regards,

Glen

-- 
Glen Barber | gjb@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Documentation Project