Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 15:14:15 +0100 From: Tomek CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info> To: Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [LDWG] [FBSD_LDWG] [Ludwig] Message-ID: <CAFYkXjkNA1uDKLBV07pcAdD3zN7ZA5E1dNQU=ny9xeOXXD90Qw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <79485993-5846-452a-b70f-69f27447ba96@gmail.com> References: <3a87200f-b835-a731-7d79-7a56a867cbca@ny-central.org> <CAFYkXjnXDKF6AxfGe3cRnnOWdYnDVWEyQcuoUL=v5-FTVdYZxw@mail.gmail.com> <79485993-5846-452a-b70f-69f27447ba96@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 6:10=E2=80=AFAM Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.c= om> wrote: > On 16/12/2024 23:04, Tomek CEDRO wrote: > > =E2=80=A6 Is it possible to name group FBSD_LDWG please? =E2=80=A6 > > For what it's worth, I'd prefer: > [Ludwig] > I'm not keen on abbreviations of FreeBSD, underscores, or hyphens. > Sooner or later, people might naturally begin mis-typing FBSD-LDWG or > fbsd-ldwg or FreeBSD_LDWG or FreeBSD-LDWG. Bear in mind, there's already > some confusion about list addresses with and without hyphens. The "FBSD" prefix is important to quickly distinguish context from thousands of other daily emails.. the closest that comes to my mind right now is LLVM, LLDB, LVGL, LVDC, .. anything prefixed with shortest possible FBSD quickly tells this is something FreeBSD related :-) I have no opinion on using "_" or "-" there are pros and cons for each, for instance "-" is more readable but can be parsed by some "smart" stuff as subtract operation ;-) The name of the working group is less important because when you already know then you already know :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFYkXjkNA1uDKLBV07pcAdD3zN7ZA5E1dNQU=ny9xeOXXD90Qw>