From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 25 15:26:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8953016A4CF for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 15:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD7443D48 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 15:26:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FB35EB7; Thu, 25 May 2006 11:26:40 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yye6aHkcpNn9; Thu, 25 May 2006 11:26:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A0E5D63; Thu, 25 May 2006 11:26:39 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4475B385.1080502@mikestammer.com> References: <44758A50.10405@messias.qhigh.com> <4475B128.5000607@mac.com> <4475B385.1080502@mikestammer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <0B01D3D5-F9D5-4E7B-A63B-E7933205B9B4@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:26:35 -0400 To: Eric X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, User Gandalf Subject: Re: Strange messages in mail queue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 15:26:48 -0000 On May 25, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Eric wrote: > what MTA are you using? i'm wondering why your server accepted the > email in the first place. Yes, well, that question implies the right direction for a solution: you want to reject spam before trying to deliver it, rather than accepting it and then being responsible for bouncing it back. -- -Chuck