From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep  5 22:37:46 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D13106564A
	for <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>; Wed,  5 Sep 2012 22:37:46 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bsd-src@helfman.org)
Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.160.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5718FC14
	for <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>; Wed,  5 Sep 2012 22:37:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so1759944pbb.13
	for <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=google.com; s=20120113;
	h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-operating-system
	:organization:x-living-the-dream:x-pgp-fingerprint:x-pgp-key
	:user-agent:x-gm-message-state;
	bh=8Ki7495+JAVdEnprej5ZbOtM8sY5pn5L+AI7afVigDE=;
	b=E9fQSBhzzzDV4l3YXdhb8CEdRgEzgdqpvHZWubopjXma54KeSIKcRWbhFL7TeZerXO
	u/mSGS8fkQNTvDYNgGBgJqCwD/4C1rz1glVGrAmuduYUq7FXDDb6VrewQLcbFwJ2gFtw
	cONADfDyPEGW+ggCeYYQELh4ll3JYlPxqRvttWBQWOJxHA/q7YrRrt8h98DOzzSNlkse
	LjUMWNHOcxPq8TetAgmQs4EuVqAKjZpqb7RHY/LUDtBkqeM9ceV9DasVj3mqm/kVPymf
	xjfq8lE4P76b1yTuKXSyeQBOHxXhH/RWmJCCVTWusqEXJv9bT+zrIMxAL9zelPao8LqP
	Az5g==
Received: by 10.68.223.164 with SMTP id qv4mr1226661pbc.20.1346884665712;
	Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hatter (adsl-66-122-69-230.dsl.snlo01.pacbell.net.
	[66.122.69.230])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id io1sm289003pbc.43.2012.09.05.15.37.43
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Jason Helfman <bsd-src@helfman.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 15:37:39 -0700
From: Jason Helfman <jgh@FreeBSD.org>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20120905223739.GA8950@hatter>
References: <201209052148.q85LmLrD007420@svn.freebsd.org>
	<5047D11C.9070006@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5047D11C.9070006@FreeBSD.org>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3 i386
Organization: The FreeBSD Project, http://www.freebsd.org
X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life!
X-PGP-FingerPrint: 8E0D C457 9A0F C91C 23F3  0454 2059 9A63 4150 D3DC
X-PGP-Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh/jgh.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnObn0KfVOmPAB4WB1jHEJVxAVaTNBRhGt6dK4BDNaak7HUwVISa2zIaBzNOq/XbWR922Ik
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
	ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r303725 - in head: deskutils/virt-manager
 devel/libvirt-java devel/p5-Sys-Virt net-mgmt/virt-viewer net-mgmt/virtinst
 net-mgmt/zenpack-libvirt sysutils/cfengine-devel sysutils/cfengine33
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
	<mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
	<mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 22:37:46 -0000

On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:24:28PM -0700, Doug Barton thus spake:
>On 09/05/2012 14:48, Jason Helfman wrote:
>> Author: jgh
>> Date: Wed Sep  5 21:48:20 2012
>> New Revision: 303725
>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/303725
>>
>> Log:
>>   - follow r303724 shlib bump of libvirt
>
>As has been discussed before, please do these commits at the same time.
>In the theoretical future where we might need to merge them to a stable
>ports branch, it's easier to merge 1 than 2; and there are no
>circumstances where we would revert just one or the other.
>
>Doug

I've asked this before this commit several times, and there was no general
consensus. It was also suggested that I follow the method in which I did
perform the commit.

While I do agree with you, if this is what we should be doing, this should
be documented accordingly by portmgr.

-jgh

-- 
Jason Helfman
FreeBSD Committer | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh | The Power To Serve