Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 15:37:39 -0700 From: Jason Helfman <jgh@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r303725 - in head: deskutils/virt-manager devel/libvirt-java devel/p5-Sys-Virt net-mgmt/virt-viewer net-mgmt/virtinst net-mgmt/zenpack-libvirt sysutils/cfengine-devel sysutils/cfengine33 Message-ID: <20120905223739.GA8950@hatter> In-Reply-To: <5047D11C.9070006@FreeBSD.org> References: <201209052148.q85LmLrD007420@svn.freebsd.org> <5047D11C.9070006@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:24:28PM -0700, Doug Barton thus spake: >On 09/05/2012 14:48, Jason Helfman wrote: >> Author: jgh >> Date: Wed Sep 5 21:48:20 2012 >> New Revision: 303725 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/303725 >> >> Log: >> - follow r303724 shlib bump of libvirt > >As has been discussed before, please do these commits at the same time. >In the theoretical future where we might need to merge them to a stable >ports branch, it's easier to merge 1 than 2; and there are no >circumstances where we would revert just one or the other. > >Doug I've asked this before this commit several times, and there was no general consensus. It was also suggested that I follow the method in which I did perform the commit. While I do agree with you, if this is what we should be doing, this should be documented accordingly by portmgr. -jgh -- Jason Helfman FreeBSD Committer | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh | The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120905223739.GA8950>