From owner-freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Mon Nov 9 17:39:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mips@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8FDA2A5BF for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 17:39:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Received: from outbound1b.ore.mailhop.org (outbound1b.ore.mailhop.org [54.200.247.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF28B15D1 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 17:39:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Received: from ilsoft.org (unknown [73.34.117.227]) by outbound1.ore.mailhop.org (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 17:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rev (rev [172.22.42.240]) by ilsoft.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id tA9HdViE001301; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 10:39:31 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <1447090771.91534.477.camel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: CPU underload From: Ian Lepore To: Adrian Chadd , Eugene Grosbein Cc: "freebsd-mips@freebsd.org" Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:39:31 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <56348063.3090508@grosbein.net> <56348239.3050701@grosbein.net> <563500FC.8020201@grosbein.net> <5635148B.2070307@grosbein.net> <56351AA6.80903@grosbein.net> <563523CA.3040207@grosbein.net> <56367686.4090801@grosbein.net> <563707A0.3040700@grosbein.net> <56370E1D.3040801@grosbein.net> <563F5630.2000407@grosbein.net> <563F938B.3070707@grosbein.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to MIPS List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:39:40 -0000 On Sun, 2015-11-08 at 11:23 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > ok, what's the l1 cache size reported at boot up? > > I think I may just bump them all to 64. > > > -a 64 is not some kind of magic panacea. The value needs to be set to the cache line size for the runtime platform. If the right value is 32, then setting it to 64 will just waste memory. -- Ian