Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 22:37:29 -0500 From: Marc Wiz <marc@wiz.com> To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Necessary code or trash? Message-ID: <20030829033728.GC9865@freshaire.wiz.com> In-Reply-To: <20030828214523.GF29750@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1671561231.20280829005225@mail.ru> <20030828213345.GD80772@christabel.starbreaker.net> <20030828213640.GI6312@freshaire.wiz.com> <20030828214523.GF29750@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 04:45:24PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Aug 28), Marc Wiz said: > > Sticking with /bin/sh is a good idea. > > > > What I have done is build a static version of bash and put it /bin > > > > I changed root's shell to /bin/bash and run just fine. > > > > Has anyone noticed what a pain it is to build bash statically and > > install it in /bin? > > I don't use bash, but the bash2 port Makefile looks like it builds a > static binary by default: > > CONFIGURE_ENV= LDFLAGS=-static Thank you! I think I discovered that after I finally built bash2. The other problem I remember having was getting the silly thing to install in /bin instead of /usr/local/bin. I'll just have to RTFM on ports the next time I try it. Marc -- Marc Wiz marc@wiz.com Yes, that really is my last name.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030829033728.GC9865>