From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 7 21:37:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11948AE5; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 21:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E148E7F; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 21:37:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Auth-ID: anat Received: from devlanhide.timeinc.net (HELO utka.zajac) ([209.251.200.245]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 Apr 2015 17:37:01 -0400 Message-ID: <55244DFC.4050609@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:37:00 -0400 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r383538 - head/databases/sqlitemanager References: <201504072014.t37KEtvQ028188@svn.freebsd.org> <55243D74.7060009@marino.st> <55244200.9060002@FreeBSD.org> <55244A00.6010702@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <55244A00.6010702@marino.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 21:37:08 -0000 On 07.04.2015 17:20, John Marino wrote: > Okay, so you "save" the port that was going to be deleted, but since you > did it against standards, you then suggest that I clean up after you > because I pointed out the mistake? (the same that that was just pointed > out in heavy fashion last week). Yes, I do think it is better to save a port imperfectly, than to let it expire for a silly reason. The port is now better, than it was. If it can be improved further, you are welcome to it. > (there it was said *NEVER* use CP to install files, so obviously what > you did is not fine.) I don't know, John, what your expectations are of the fellow ports-maintainers, but I'm not going to review archives of mailing lists every time I do a commit. If portlint and other automated checks I'm aware of are happy, then so am I. Thank you for your time. -mi