From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 28 09:09:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9852516A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:09:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FBA443CE for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:40:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (localhost.natserv.net [127.0.0.1]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6F5B8BE; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:40:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 35st-server.simplicato.com (static-71-249-233-130.nycmny.east.verizon.net [71.249.233.130]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227EEB88E; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:40:12 -0400 (EDT) References: <20060620060845.U1114@ganymede.hub.org> <20060621183832.H1114@ganymede.hub.org> <20060621195523.I1114@ganymede.hub.org> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: Atom Powers Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:40:11 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:04:59 +0000 Cc: Marc =?ISO-8859-1?B?Ry4=?= Fournier , Ted Mittelstaedt , Nikolas Britton , chad@shire.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Are hardware vendors starting to bail on FreeBSD ... ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:09:42 -0000 Atom Powers writes: > Yes. All the servers I'm installing this year will have SATA drives > (and 3ware RAID controllers). The Western Digital Raptor drives are > every bit as good as the SCSI drives I used to get. Perhaps as the ones you used to get, but not as good as you can get. Dont get me wrong.. I can get approval to go SCSI since our machines need at least 1T+ (the storage machines), but looking at the benchmarks at storagereview (http://storagereview.com) shows there is still a significant performance difference between SCSI and SATA.