From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 15:27:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502A616A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:27:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman.arcor.de (postman2.arcor-online.net [151.189.0.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CE443D41 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:27:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-51-21.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.51.21]) (authenticated bits=0)i0RNQsgG014239 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:26:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Alcbd-000Dtd-T9; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:26:53 +0100 Message-ID: <4016F3BD.4040001@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:26:53 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <004401c3e4cf$647d91e0$c10133ce@dilkie.com> <200401271202.17222.kstewart@owt.com> <20040127213718.GC68505@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040127213718.GC68505@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: mdunham@kestrelworks.com cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Kent Stewart Subject: Re: Kopete 7.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:27:31 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:02:17PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > >>>I always do a "make index" in the /usr/ports directory. Have I been >>>doing it wrong? >> >>No, I also use make index because historically there were significantly >>fewer error messages. I think someone almost got hysterical from >>surprise a short time ago when portsdb -U completed with out a single >>message. >> >>My attitude is that if Kris' script ran portsdb -U, then I would use it >>everytime I cvsup ports-all instead of using make index. > > AFAIK portsdb -U just calls 'make index' internally. The difference > would then presumably be caused by the make environment: my index > build tests simulate a clean environment by defining LOCALBASE, > X11BASE, etc. Not really. portsdb -U calls portsdb.update, which is defined in /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/portsdb.rb under 'def update' and calls /usr/local/sbin/make_describe_pass1 /usr/local/sbin/make_describe_pass2 /usr/ports/Tools/make_index But I guess knu is the expert here...