From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct  6 17:31:43 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64A416A4D1
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Oct 2004 17:31:43 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90AF443D39
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Oct 2004 17:31:43 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from elischer.org (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97])
	by mail.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738777A403
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Oct 2004 10:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <41642BFF.6070807@elischer.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 10:31:43 -0700
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030516
X-Accept-Language: en, hu
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: current@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: fsck patches and fsck problems..
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:31:43 -0000

I've been trying for a while to get someone to look at a set of changes 
that VICOR uses to make
fsck behave better. The recent change to fix one of these problems upset 
our deveopler here
who fixed all this years ago.. Because he cannot intrest anyone in 
taking back these fixes..

Is there someone in FreeBSD who has his fingers in fsck/ufs and can look 
at these changes?