From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 25 13:42:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511F71065673 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:42:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.icecube.wisc.edu (trout.icecube.wisc.edu [128.104.255.119]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278928FC15 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.icecube.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DD1582A6; Tue, 25 May 2010 08:13:04 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at icecube.wisc.edu Received: from mail.icecube.wisc.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (trout.icecube.wisc.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id 2i4TKu29fLgB; Tue, 25 May 2010 08:13:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wanderer.tachypleus.net (adsl-76-233-145-159.dsl.mdsnwi.sbcglobal.net [76.233.145.159]) by mail.icecube.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D2A58267; Tue, 25 May 2010 08:13:04 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4BFBCCDE.6050900@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 08:13:02 -0500 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100504) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Bethke References: <7DB9656A-44DF-4A37-B9A4-652451234FEE@lassitu.de> In-Reply-To: <7DB9656A-44DF-4A37-B9A4-652451234FEE@lassitu.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current Current , Robert Watson Subject: Re: AppleTalk status X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:42:44 -0000 Stefan Bethke wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on updating net/netatalk to version 2.1 (or 2.1.1 when that comes out the next couple of days), and I'm wondering what state AppleTalk support is in these days. Is anybody still using it, or would now be the time to make all AppleTalk support in that port optional, and just focus on the file server component? > > I haven't used AppleTalk for at least eight years now, and I don't quite see which setting it still would be used in nowadays... > > > Thanks, > Stefan > > I use it successfully on a router to connect my antique AppleTalk-only laser printer. It seems to work quite well still. -Nathan