Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:41:06 -0400
From:      Gerard Seibert <gerard@seibercom.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: the art of pkgdb -F
Message-ID:  <20070329164106.27389f8a@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20070329204005.1c3b7130@gumby.homeunix.com>
References:  <20070328011712.GR11147@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <20070327202842.1678265c.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <d7195cff0703272219r3e504bd5tb09ca5acd3f82776@mail.gmail.com> <20070328212432.669353e4@gumby.homeunix.com> <20070329003659.GW11147@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <20070329121553.070a6321@localhost> <20070329204005.1c3b7130@gumby.homeunix.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_tO5Afm/85fnX0gF9oC3rxhU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:40:05 +0100
RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> wrote:

> Portmanager is really no better, the dependencies recorded in the
> package database are also recursive. The big problem with gettext
> was that a lot of port failed to build afterwards, leaving them with a
> missing library.

I have had problems in the past getting 'portupgrade' to properly
update all of the dependencies required when doing a major update;
i.e., 'gettext'.=20

On the other hand, I have never had a problem using 'portmanager'
provided I used the '-p -f' flags.

Portmanager can update its list of ports that need updating on the fly.
I do not believe that either portupdate or portmaster have that ability.
I noticed that when doing the 'gettext' update, it twice recalculated
the number of ports that needed to have their dependencies updated.

It would probably behoove anyone prior to doing a massive update to
clean out the '/usr/ports/distfiles' directory and possibly running
'portsclean -C -D -l -PP' to insure that any old crud was not laying
around. It certainly couldn't hurt.

Just my 2 cents.



--=20
Gerard

Be careful how you get yourself involved with persons or
situations that can't bear inspection.

--Sig_tO5Afm/85fnX0gF9oC3rxhU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGDCRiFCqdq4D1ybYRArOGAKC7XGZueCAHViA65jBf2+p5EmUlXwCgovI7
Fw+i4tPSutthgJc+xuWvPYQ=
=fBr+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_tO5Afm/85fnX0gF9oC3rxhU--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070329164106.27389f8a>