From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 20 08:13:49 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1D976F9
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 08:13:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C919B3CB9
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 08:13:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7K8Dn5h063231
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 08:13:49 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 192828] [new port] add squid34 to ports
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 08:13:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-192828-13-9ndGBrKH6C@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-192828-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-192828-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 08:13:50 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192828

--- Comment #15 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
you are not "cutting" options in the sense the capability is lost.  You are
building it with that capability as a default.

Any option that is off by default means it's not in a binary package.  The more
options there are, the more likely the binary package is useless.  

Even there are tons of options, as many as possible should be turned on by
default so the capability is in the binary package, leaving only source
builders to remove them manually.

I get the idea you are focused on building from source.  You need to be looking
at this from a useful binary package point of view.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.