From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 19 06:09:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59F616A4CE for ; Wed, 19 May 2004 06:09:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ojoink.com (center.ojoink.com [216.65.123.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E4943D31 for ; Wed, 19 May 2004 06:09:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from amd64list@jpgsworld.com) Received: (qmail 48911 invoked by uid 89); 19 May 2004 13:12:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MAINBX.jpgsworld.com) (amd64list@jpgsworld.com@24.10.96.33) by center.ojoink.com with SMTP; 19 May 2004 13:12:04 -0000 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040519060611.0435f750@mail.ojoink.com> X-Sender: amd64list@jpgsworld.com@mail.ojoink.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 06:07:49 -0700 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org From: JG In-Reply-To: <40AB58C1.7070205@myrealbox.com> References: <5.2.0.9.2.20040519052743.04365f78@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040518170424.03c42748@mail.ojoink.com> <200405181359.18291.peter@wemm.org> <5.2.0.9.2.20040518103357.04c6cbb8@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040518103357.04c6cbb8@mail.ojoink.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040519052743.04365f78@mail.ojoink.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: Why is MySQL nearly twice as fast on Linux/AMD64 Vs. FreeBSD/AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 13:09:02 -0000 At 04:53 PM 5/19/2004 +0400, you wrote: >In first time you built MySQL statically. >Now - dinamically. > >What results with statical linked MySQL ? > >JG wrote: Those results are in earlier posts of this thread. I compiled it dynamically to be sure that libpthreads was used. (so I could use ldd against mysqld)