From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 28 18:11:35 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DB1AF97
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:11:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org",
 Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F07721DCB
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:11:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-232-70.lns20.per1.internode.on.net
 [121.45.232.70]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s3SIBPgu069858
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
 Mon, 28 Apr 2014 11:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org)
Message-ID: <535E99C8.7050309@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 02:11:20 +0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no>,
 Leif Pedersen <bilbo@hobbiton.org>
Subject: Re: ports requiring OpenSSL not honouring OpenSSL from ports
References: <201404271508.s3RF8sMA014085@catnip.dyslexicfish.net>
 <AFCC7276-2C8F-423E-A417-AE492F5162E6@vpnc.org>
 <CAK-wPOhxRtCxCsxE1Y5UvL-U18FOnhgMMfH7gDZ5PHZp_sH_5w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK-wPOi60JMc+R2zkmLvoJGu6_AFTHcgrUKHpZUy1qgHSEVG2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <86eh0hsq3w.fsf@nine.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <86eh0hsq3w.fsf@nine.des.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
 <freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:11:35 -0000

On 4/28/14, 6:30 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Leif Pedersen <bilbo@hobbiton.org> writes:
>> I realized that we don't really need any extravagance from ld at all.
>> Move the files for the base version of openssl to a different
>> location, and replace them with symlinks.
> ...and break your system.
>
> OpenSSL 0.9.x and 1.0.x are *not* binary compatible.

are they somewhat "API" compatible?  can you compile most code against 
either?

>
> DES