From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 17 21:14:15 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B3B9AA
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:14:15 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com)
Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com
 [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079578F6
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:14:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030D73B00B
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:14:03 -0800 (PST)
From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com>
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: WTF? RPCPROG_NFS: RPC: Program not registered
In-Reply-To: <689563329.3076797.1361028594307.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:14:03 -0800
Message-ID: <18442.1361135643@server1.tristatelogic.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:14:15 -0000


In message <689563329.3076797.1361028594307.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>,
Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> wrote:

>Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> nfs_server_flags="-h 192.168.1.2"
>Add -t to these flags. It appears that the default is UDP only.


YESSSS!  Thank you.  That did the trick alright.

I gather than in the 9.x series, there is a new nfs server thing, yes?

And I further gather than this one needs to new -t flag, yes?

(Sigh.  My own feeling is that tcp support should have been enabled by
default... as in the past.)

Anyway, thanks again for your help.


Regards,
rfg