Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 23:38:18 -0600 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Brandon Falk <bfalk_bsd@brandonfa.lk> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Graphical Terminal Environment Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK3Fp8m%2B0ccAjiAAKj_JJ1nQEYRBSwg_sYEPqOoWJgUfog@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGSJxJ5BBPkrjwGFLomFvoj%2Bh_qaEmqT%2Bi6tVx__tBVf4yZDYg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAGSJxJ7yRZJydw7fNGyTnsykfsJf2Q0VzoFbKX-%2BSgNspiOhoA@mail.gmail.com> <4F55A0EA.8000300@gmail.com> <CAGSJxJ5BBPkrjwGFLomFvoj%2Bh_qaEmqT%2Bi6tVx__tBVf4yZDYg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Brandon Falk <bfalk_bsd@brandonfa.lk>wrote: > I'm actually talking about perhaps getting rid of X11 totally. It's > overkill for what I need. I use dwm right now and I basically want to > create a dwm that doesn't have the massive X11 backend. X11 is well > written, but it's getting outdated and quite large, especially if you only > need terminals and no graphics (and really, I just want to learn, I > understand that I'm 'reinventing the wheel'). > Perhaps I'm misunderstanding, but doesn't vidcontrol+ tmux already do this? -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK3Fp8m%2B0ccAjiAAKj_JJ1nQEYRBSwg_sYEPqOoWJgUfog>