Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 14:14:16 +0100 From: Matthias Buelow <token@wuff.mayn.de> To: Mikhail Evstiounin <evstiounin@adelphia.net>, Oren Sarig <sarig@bezeqint.net>, Marc Wandschneider <MarcW@Lanfear.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: latest gcc? Message-ID: <19991126141416.C27425@wuff.mayn.de> In-Reply-To: <012901bf3761$15227b80$ee353018@evstiouninadelphia.net.pit.adelphia.net>; from Mikhail Evstiounin on Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 11:21:07AM -0500 References: <012901bf3761$15227b80$ee353018@evstiouninadelphia.net.pit.adelphia.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mikhail Evstiounin wrote: >this is a case for FreeBSD too. You can't use this compiler to compile >kernel, but it's more robust, faster and supports exceptions, has a better >optimization, supports namespaces, etc. <pedantic> Of course you can't use this compiler to compile the kernel since I don't think it would be possible to compile the kernel with a C++ compiler. </pedantic> OTOH, NetBSD is using egcs and compiling everything (including the kernel) with -O2 on all ports; would it be that hard to get the FreeBSD system source to compile correctly with that optimization level on egcs? mkb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991126141416.C27425>