From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 9 20:45:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA48CBD; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 20:45:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmh.aybabtu@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-x235.google.com (mail-qa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15B61B6C; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 20:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id g10so3191660qah.12 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:45:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=tIhTCseC5UlTgsEfXvtcqlHJ2jMJ6LKi+sHPMgROK98=; b=sX8oH3AL4fCIIHO3XbrJb57E19WDtSq4zRCve8HwOCEQylCQkd9IIZz/t/6ug74GHA P5bBevhdEl21MuV+3MDhWA+B6WsVHEqYSdJxqDgdvzgRxWgWneu0ORxpP8lIvYgwOz7B 1chmO2X1aW/EKAhvnvKcQ7UIKlvqDjKPthG8eTBXoo8MeC7g8X0hKg15nPdy3vWqr4Xi Szu528iHFWFipymSJxJh/YuF7uZmOU9YEyLLCJGbnexcC/e25y8mKVXFtlQFyRnjkRLn r0CSbalI4vOfF1tTeL17qfXfKVOkJrXVbiLlGjhIZlDYysHCwMUS+rX6AgHfrkioSZo3 73Tg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.165.77 with SMTP id h13mr15563635qay.58.1373402703531; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:45:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: rmh.aybabtu@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.26.193 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:45:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20130709113553.GP67810@FreeBSD.org> <20130709165939.GP91021@kib.kiev.ua> <0657575A-BF3A-486F-9582-C01E0FD97E38@bsdimp.com> <51DC4712.20707@coosemans.org> <6E057FD0-9054-44CD-A806-3AFD8A7196CC@bsdimp.com> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 22:45:03 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6lzQcUngydK8k1oFhGoFLQ_YLrM Message-ID: Subject: Re: libutil in Debian From: Robert Millan To: Peter Wemm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Konstantin Belousov , Tijl Coosemans , Gleb Smirnoff , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 20:45:04 -0000 2013/7/9 Peter Wemm : > Create a symlink from libbsdutil.so -> libutil.so and libbsdutil.a -> > libutil.a and change nothing else, including keeping -lutil? I'm not > entirely sure what that achieves, but it is harmless as far as I can > see and creates no run-time ABI issues. The problem is that right now, if we wanted to provide FreeBSD libutil in Debian we'd have to rename it. Of course we could just make up an arbitrary name and use that, but it would introduce a gratuitous divergence, and the reason we want libutil in first place is that we want to be more compatible with FreeBSD. -- Robert Millan