From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Jun 1 14:54:40 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA06708 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 14:54:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from diazepam.gnu.ai.mit.edu (joelh@diazepam.gnu.ai.mit.edu [128.52.46.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA06702 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 14:54:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by diazepam.gnu.ai.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12GNU) id RAA32452; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 17:54:20 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 17:54:20 -0400 Message-Id: <199706012154.RAA32452@diazepam.gnu.ai.mit.edu> To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au CC: jkh@time.cdrom.com, chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <199706010426.NAA11621@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> (message from Michael Smith on Sun, 1 Jun 1997 13:56:32 +0930 (CST)) Subject: Re: Borland 16bit bcc vs cc/gcc (float) From: Joel Ray Holveck Reply-to: joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> In fact, weren't you also the guy who was unlear on the precedence of >> = vs == ? If so, I think you _really_ need to go by a C book and >> do some brushing up. ;) >> I recommend Harbison & Steele. >I wonder if there would be any chance of shipping K&R 2ed in soft form >with the system? It's my favoured reference 8) Really? I find that the items which I frequently need to refer to are library calls, which aren't discussed in any great detail (where they are discussed at all). -- http://www.wp.com/piquan --- Joel Ray Holveck --- joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu All my opinions are my own, not the Free Software Foundation's. Second law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation -- core dumped