Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:07:49 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> Cc: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>, Peter Seebach <seebs@plethora.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fixing documented bug in env(1) Message-ID: <p05100e0fb742eb88d5a5@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20010605190447.B9976@tao.org.uk> References: <20010602041242.849893E33@bazooka.unixfreak.org> <p05100e09b73e2fbdba9e@[128.113.24.47]> <20010605190447.B9976@tao.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 7:04 PM +0100 6/5/01, Josef Karthauser wrote: >On Sat, Jun 02, 2001, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > >> It also strikes me that this might be another topic to >> send thru freebsd-standards@bostonradio.org, as Posix >> might have something to say about what's appropriate. >> > >How much traffic does this list produce and how many people >are on it? >The first I heard of it's existance was a few days ago on >one of the lists. May I propose that we make this an offical >list so that it can be utilised by the wider community? Not much traffic. Not many people. It can be used by anyone who wants to join. I think Garrett originally proposed it as a "@freebsd.org" list, but it was felt that it wouldn't see enough traffic (and indeed, it has been very low-traffic). My only fear is that I might be encouraging its use for things it wasn't really meant for. It was mainly meant to talk about efforts to update freebsd to follow the various Posix standards, such as the latest Posix draft on how /usr/include libraries should be laid out. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05100e0fb742eb88d5a5>