From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 20 11:59:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB7316A47B for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dennisolvany@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A789443D5A for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:59:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennisolvany@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i34so1218432wra for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:59:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=I11QuvmRZkqSPGZZ8uk/02TgcrXm6wQEf+BltxxXOBASbRxOxSQv64xW7XYiW/rn1I98iTn1Di5+BWRiuOrycIh/LFcHlQCQ4jf0sFOskwiPiQCuYqX1ugE0rQIEtaPHausZh/FpudleQiUmgJj74q5QqAdhlkEXGAiXp6NZf+A= Received: by 10.54.61.16 with SMTP id j16mr449978wra; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:59:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?195.16.87.34? ( [195.16.87.34]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 45sm4979976wri.2006.06.20.04.59.19; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:59:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4497E314.1060805@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 06:59:16 -0500 From: Dennis Olvany User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060211) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= References: <4495F9A1.8040407@gmail.com> <867j3dwjq3.fsf@xps.des.no> <449691D9.4020704@gmail.com> <86odwputto.fsf@xps.des.no> <4497737D.5020902@gmail.com> <86d5d4upmh.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86d5d4upmh.fsf@xps.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: David Hoffman , freebsd-user-groups@freebsd.org, thisdayislong , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, ingrid@cityscope.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Serious breach of copyright -- First post X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:59:35 -0000 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Dennis Olvany writes: >> Johnathan Michaels hit on the next point I would like to make and >> that is the distinction between patent and copyright. A method or >> process may be patented, but the factual written procedure of such >> may not be copyrighted. I'll follow up with some examples of the >> types are things that are not copyrightable in a final attempt to >> convey my point. > You are wrong. The method or process is patentable. A written > description of the method or process is copyrightable. howto change oil 1. remove oil cap 2. drain oil 3. remove filter 4. etc. So, you're saying my little oil change procedure is copyrightable? Laughable.