From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec  9 11:02:42 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762D416A4CE
	for <freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  9 Dec 2003 11:02:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.167])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B98B43D2A
	for <freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  9 Dec 2003 11:02:39 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk)
Received: from scan1.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.166] helo=localhost)
	by tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1ATn82-0006UI-Hb
	for freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 19:02:38 +0000
Received: from rx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.165])
 by localhost (scan1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.166]) (amavisd-new, port 25)
 with ESMTP id 24745-06 for <freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org>;
 Tue,  9 Dec 2003 19:02:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.161.253])
	by rx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1ATn82-0006UA-4B
	for freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 19:02:38 +0000
Received: (qmail 12419 invoked by uid 0); 9 Dec 2003 19:02:38 -0000
Received: from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk by gateway by uid 71 with
	qmail-scanner-1.16  (sweep: 2.14/3.71. spamassassin: 2.53.  Clear:. 
	Processed in 2.414434 secs); 09 Dec 2003 19:02:38 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk via gateway
X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.16 (Clear:. Processed in 2.414434 secs)
Received: from dhcp1131.wadham.ox.ac.uk (HELO piii600.wadham.ox.ac.uk)
	(163.1.161.131)
	by gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk with SMTP; 9 Dec 2003 19:02:35 -0000
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.1.20031209190044.02d6c528@popserver.sfu.ca>
X-Sender: cperciva@popserver.sfu.ca
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 19:02:33 +0000
To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ),
	pav@FreeBSD.org
From: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <xzpvfoq2oyi.fsf@dwp.des.no>
References: <1070833971.78821.1.camel@hood.oook.cz>
 <5.0.2.1.1.20031207171127.02d4f708@popserver.sfu.ca>
 <1070833971.78821.1.camel@hood.oook.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
cc: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: port maintainers not in contrib.additional.sgml
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 19:02:42 -0000

At 12:46 09/12/2003 +0100, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
>Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > I was under impression that only authors of new ports are listed there.
> > If someone take existing port, he's not automatically listed there.
>
>Anyone maintaining a port is most definitely a contributor and should
>be listed.

   Is that an official answer?  The last thing I want to do is send emails
out to 600+ addresses, collect together the responses, and then have to
write back to say "oops, sorry, we can't list you after all".

Colin Percival