From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 16 11:37:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75E716A4CE; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 11:37:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from complx.LF.net (complx.LF.net [212.9.190.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2716E43FCB; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 11:37:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@complx.LF.net) Received: from lists by complx.LF.net with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ALSi0-000KJC-PE; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:37:20 +0100 Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:37:20 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031116193720.GA61630@complx.LF.net> References: <20031115182409.GA2001@blossom.cjclark.org> <200311161911.UAA25957@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200311161911.UAA25957@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> Subject: Re: IPSec VPN & NATD (problem with alias_address vs redirect_addr ess) X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 19:37:23 -0000 Hi! > FreeBSD lacks features deployed in the market, when acting as a VPN > endpoint, as well as when acting as a NAT device in the VPN packet flow. > Either is a pity, unfortunately. > > I am not complaining; I am just stating that we're behind. But FreeS/WAN > is in no better shape. Who would be willing/capable to add this to the code, if someone else (maybe LF.net?) would pay for the expense ? -- MfG/Best regards, Kurt Jaeger 17 years to go ! LF.net GmbH fon +49 711 90074-23 pi@LF.net Ruppmannstr. 27 fax +49 711 90074-33 D-70565 Stuttgart mob +49 171 3101372