From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sat Nov 30 02:26:04 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA04652
          for bugs-outgoing; Sat, 30 Nov 1996 02:26:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA04641
          for <bugs@freebsd.org>; Sat, 30 Nov 1996 02:26:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.3/8.6.9) with ESMTP id CAA01024; Sat, 30 Nov 1996 02:25:54 -0800 (PST)
To: Phil Gilley <pgilley@metronet.com>
cc: bugs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 2.1.6.1 uname(1) command 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 29 Nov 1996 23:01:53 CST."
             <Pine.HPP.3.95.961129225859.21692A-100000@fohnix.metronet.com> 
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 1996 02:25:54 -0800
Message-ID: <1022.849349554@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> But uname(1) still shows 2.1.6-RELEASE.  I assume this is because
> REVISION="2.1.6.1" which is defined in /sys/conf/newvers.sh is never
> actually used.

Yikes, are you sure?  On the freshly made 2.1.6.1 system I have here,
uname -a reports:

jkh@whisker-> uname -a
FreeBSD whisker.cdrom.com 2.1.6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 2.1.6.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Nov 25 03:06:45 PST 1996     jkh@whisker.cdrom.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/WHISKER  i386

					Jordan