From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 22 06:37:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19135106566B for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 06:37:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916D48FC0A for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 06:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so1588585bkv.13 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:37:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3FHWahBNSmkDzj/9EPX3KWRIgSUPq6zSompB1i4IVIs=; b=DdchqKkDNat+UqxAHTAB621RaCWS2VuhTkYr7WKKhMmwTQTzahGMSVMjctHwU49SK/ JwFi917bH6w6u1WC36G+ziI1oYmPubVszg/v8A3tLPS2ZWCi4tdIvWTCCaTgODckQSdW plOxA4e0Q1GV4M6dD4Lw6+Du25A8wCLBMZBT5xktvlCl4yyZB1S5osW584kf7FEMD6T1 8vIHHvYMkbB3mWTLa/xNPc8OX8ghe5hT/9y3+e2zAmFaX0Gcyinfpt1t35G5qQifammF ph3U/3ih/MwIeEqpChLXF7wX+SGMcYq2w3Laf7NiTSbwhttkG6zjOTYxRY7/Qh8NzhBD 9yZw== Received: by 10.204.129.196 with SMTP id p4mr347020bks.28.1340347022384; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from green.tandem.local (utwig.xim.bz. [91.216.237.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e20sm34686553bkv.10.2012.06.21.23.36.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Jun 2012 23:36:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FE41288.5020404@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:36:56 +0300 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120605 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201206201015.q5KAFKKj026496@mail.r-bonomi.com> <20120620171112.GB23095@hemlock.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20120620171112.GB23095@hemlock.hydra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 06:37:09 -0000 Chad Perrin wrote: > Someone in this extended discussion mentioned that there are efforts > underway to make sure the base system will compile cleanly with both > Clang and GCC 4.2+, so I think you're just making up complaints here. > Someone (other than Wojciech Puchar, who would just be talking out of his > ass) correct me if I'm mistaken. That was me. I don't have pure facts but I read svn logs daily. Today we have a bunch of: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r237428 | eadler | 2012-06-22 08:48:53 +0300 (пт, 22 чер 2012) | 5 lines MFC r237253: Remove variables which are initialized but never used thereafter reported by gcc46 warning Approved by: cperciva (implicit) So at least there are some people working on polishing CURRENT/STABLE up to the point it will build with gcc46. -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.