From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Apr 21 01:20:17 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA28873
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 01:20:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shadows.aeon.net (bsdhack@shadows.aeon.net [194.100.41.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA28868
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 01:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bsdhack@localhost)
          by shadows.aeon.net (8.8.5/8.8.3) id LAA29137;
          Mon, 21 Apr 1997 11:19:20 +0300 (EET DST)
From: mika ruohotie <bsdhack@shadows.aeon.net>
Message-Id: <199704210819.LAA29137@shadows.aeon.net>
Subject: Re: Price of FreeBSD (was On Holy Wars...)
In-Reply-To: <199704202005.NAA08460@phaeton.artisoft.com> from Terry Lambert at "Apr 20, 97 01:05:01 pm"
To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert)
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 11:19:20 +0300 (EET DST)
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Unless you are talking about NT 3.51, you're wrong: it does not need
> a reboot, just an undocumented call into an undocumented DLL.  Microsoft
> just likes to ask for reboots because their change flag doesn't have
> the necessary granularity to distinguish between "changes needing a
> reboot" and "simple changes" -- all they see are "changes".

and information about that can be found from?

is that probably a new feature still on the level of "experimental" and
"not fully implemented"? or just there?

> 					Terry Lambert


mickey