From owner-cvs-all Fri Sep 14 6: 4: 0 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from tao.org.uk (genius.tao.org.uk [212.135.162.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0EF137B412; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 06:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 100) id A9F1B431; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 14:03:45 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 14:03:45 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/postfix Makefile ports/mail/postfix/files patch-aj Message-ID: <20010914140345.G3913@tao.org.uk> References: <200109140322.f8E3M8O68957@freefall.freebsd.org> <86k7z230rg.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <20010914125250.B3913@tao.org.uk> <20010914074749.A52452@leviathan.inethouston.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lQSB8Tqijvu1+4Ba" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010914074749.A52452@leviathan.inethouston.net>; from dwcjr@inethouston.net on Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 07:47:49AM -0500 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --lQSB8Tqijvu1+4Ba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 07:47:49AM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > > I don't think you needed to bump PORTREVISION, since it was just a > > > typo rather than a bug, and it doesn't require the users to upgrade > > > the port if they configure postfix correctly. > > >=20 > > > Besides, that line doesn't affect anything at all, it seems. :) > >=20 > > Please don't bump the PORTREVISION unnecessarily. Every bump suggests > > to thousands of users that they need to upgrade. That's a lot of wasted > > man-hours if it's not necessary. > >=20 >=20 > I understand the wasted man hours, but how else are you supposed to=20 > get the packages to be recreated without a version bump. I thought=20 > PORTREVISION was exactly for that reason, recreating the packages,=20 > not for much else? Sorry, I thought that the change wasn't functional. Joe --lQSB8Tqijvu1+4Ba Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjuiADEACgkQXVIcjOaxUBa8PACZATBGE8CtpFCPcEXn0+F497zk ArcAoOnfsZb1ugGYtk+Ottsx1v8mzvMK =oKyc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lQSB8Tqijvu1+4Ba-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message